Governance, risk and compliance

Carry the fiduciary duty for your agents without a blind spot in the record.

You are accountable for what your agents rely on, yet that evidence sits scattered across logs. Signura captures each reliance as a first-class record your governors can retrieve and stand behind.

Start a conversation See the audit ledger

What the reliance record gives an owner who carries the duty.

A named liable party

Each attestation carries explicit scope and a named party who stands behind the claim, so accountability is not diffuse and reliance is not blind. The liability an issuer accepts is scoped and stated, not open-ended.

Limits enforced on every reliance

Governors set which issuers and attestation types agents may depend on, with scope, value thresholds and expiry. Those limits are checked on each reliance, not assumed once at onboarding.

Escalation on high-risk reliance

When a reliance falls outside its configured scope, threshold or expiry, the case is routed to a human governor to approve or refuse. No material commitment rests on agent discretion alone.

A tamper-evident evidence trail

Every reliance event is recorded as a first-class artefact showing what evidence underpinned the decision — for governance, liability and dispute resolution — rather than reconstructed later from partial logs.

Why fiduciary accountability needs a record, not a reassurance.

The duty does not transfer to the agent

When an AI agent acts across an organisational boundary, it relies on facts owned by someone else — that a licence is valid, a policy is in force, a permission has been granted. The agent can be given the work, but the accountability for the decision stays with the humans who govern it. That is the position a governance, risk and compliance owner actually occupies: answerable for reliance decisions made at machine speed, in volumes no person can review one by one.

The usual control is human-in-the-loop approval. At low volume it works. At the volume agents generate, it drives consent fatigue, and reviewers begin approving reflexively. The control becomes nominal — present on paper, absent in practice. Signura is built so the human decision is reserved for the cases that warrant it. Routine reliance within agreed scope proceeds; anything outside its scope, value threshold or expiry is escalated to a governor, so the approvals a person gives are ones they have genuinely considered.

A logged reliance is different from a log line

When a past decision is questioned, an ordinary application log tells you an agent acted, but not which claim it relied on, what scope that claim carried, who stood behind it, or that the proof was unaltered. Signura records each reliance as a tamper-evident trail assembled at the moment of decision, so the evidence exists as a deliberate artefact rather than something you try to reconstruct after the fact. This is the difference between asserting that a decision was sound and being able to demonstrate it.

What the exchange does not decide for you

Signura is neutral by design. It sits between issuers and relying agents and takes neither side's part: it does not decide which issuers you should admit, nor guarantee any legal outcome from a claim turning out wrong. What it provides is the mechanism and the evidence — a signed attestation with a named liable party, verified at decision time, and a record your governors can retrieve. The judgement about which facts are good enough to rely on, and on whose word, remains yours to make and to own.

What owners raise

Questions a governance owner asks first.

Does adding a reliance layer shift liability rather than remove it?

For a governance owner, the point is auditability: the record shows which party accepted what scope of responsibility for each claim, captured at the moment your agent relied on it. Signura carries and logs that arrangement; it does not assume the liability itself and promises no particular legal outcome should a claim prove wrong. What changes is that the answerable party is documented before reliance, so a later review is not left to infer it.

Why should we rely on a neutral operator sitting between issuer and agent?

The exchange is neutral by construction: it takes neither the issuer's side nor the relying agent's. Its role is to carry the signed proof and log the reliance, not to vouch for either party. The claim's authority comes from the named issuer, and the record shows exactly what was relied upon — so you check the evidence rather than take the operator's word.

Can agent discretion actually be bounded, or is this control only nominal?

Governors define which issuers and attestation types are admissible, with scope, value thresholds and expiry. Those limits are enforced on each reliance, and anything falling outside them is escalated to a human rather than proceeding on agent discretion. The control is exercised at every event, not asserted once.

What can we produce when a past agent decision is questioned in a review?

You can retrieve the reliance record for that decision: which attestation was verified, its scope, the party who stood behind it, and evidence that the proof was unaltered. Because it is recorded as a first-class, tamper-evident artefact at decision time, it is retrievable rather than reconstructed from scattered logs.

What happens when a fact changes after our agent has relied on it?

The issuer revokes the attestation and the change propagates to relying parties, so subsequent decisions distinguish a currently valid claim from a stale one. The reliance your agent already made remains in the record as it stood at that moment, with the evidence it was based on.

Start a conversation with the team.

Bring one reliance decision your governors would have to stand behind in a review, and we will walk through how the exchange records it.

Read the thesis Start a conversation

Get in touch

Tell us what your governors must stand behind.

Describe the reliance decisions you are accountable for and the evidence a review would demand. A person reads every message and replies.

hello@signura.ai

Site search